Glossary
Personalization Weight
Updated February 28, 2026
Personalization weight is the importance assigned to your safety profile, goals, adherence, and symptom history during ranking.
Why it matters
The more complete your profile, the more your recommendations reflect your actual constraints than generic population averages.
How weights are built
Think of them as adjustable priors:
- Safety and interaction risk
- Goal priority
- Adherence consistency
- Sensitivity and reaction history
These inputs combine with evidence metadata and recency weighting.
Why user inputs dominate
A single repeated behavior change can outweigh older sparse history because it changes current state:
- if adherence rises from 40% to 85%, consistency gains can pull more structured stacks forward
- if missed-dose events cluster again, exploratory suggestions can lose priority
Practical effect examples
- one extra 2-hour late pattern can shift weights toward route/frequency simplification
- adding a sensitivity note can reprioritize calming compounds above stimulating ones
- reducing uncertainty in doses can increase confidence without changing the compounds themselves
Practical action step
Use a meaningful update window (3+ days) after behavior change before expecting ranking to settle.
Uncertainty and limits
- Evidence is limited on perfect weight transfer across different life phases and medication changes.
- Evidence is limited on long-term stability of personalization settings without ongoing logging.
Cross-site references
How this appears in Unfair
Personalization weights show up as why-same-ingredient recommendations rise, fall, or pause when your behavior changes between cycles.
Clinical safety note
Behavior changes can be dramatic; if significant symptoms emerge, prioritize safety settings over optimization weights.