Blog

Top 10 Supplement Myths Debunked

Unfair Team • January 10, 2026

Most supplement myths survive because marketing language moves faster than careful protocol review.

Why it matters

Common myths claim more compounds always means better results, natural always means safe, and rapid effects always signal high quality. These claims fail when you compare them with dose response studies and adverse event reports. Myth driven stack design often raises cost and risk at the same time.

How to apply it

Treat every bold claim as a testable statement. Ask what outcome was measured, in which population, at what dose, and for how long. If those answers are missing, keep the claim out of your active stack.

In Unfair

Unfair keeps rationale next to each recommendation so hype language is less likely to drive your stack decisions.

Continue with Evidence-First Supplement Prioritization, Common Supplement Stack Mistakes to Avoid, Understanding Supplement Categories.

Related

Evidence-First Supplement Prioritization

Evidence first prioritization keeps your stack focused on compounds with a clear signal in human data.

Common Supplement Stack Mistakes to Avoid

Most stack failures come from poor sequencing and poor tracking rather than bad ingredients alone.

Understanding Supplement Categories

Knowing supplement categories helps you pick compounds by job instead of by marketing label.