tuneTypical Dose
1.5–6 g/day in ED-focused trials. 4–24 g/day ranges used in vascular studies
Amino Acid
2-Amino-5-guanidino-pentanoic acid
tuneTypical Dose
1.5–6 g/day in ED-focused trials. 4–24 g/day ranges used in vascular studies
watchEffect Window
4 weeks to 3 months depending on outcome.
check_circleCompliance
WADA NOT PROHIBITED
Overview
L-arginine is an amino acid substrate for nitric oxide synthesis and vascular dilation. It is used for blood flow support, endothelial function goals, and erectile function symptoms.
Studies show modest improvements in endothelial function and small blood pressure reductions in some populations, with potential benefits for mild erectile dysfunction. Exercise performance effects remain inconsistent because oral arginine is limited by substantial first-pass metabolism. Pregnancy-related preeclampsia prevention is the most interesting secondary signal, but it belongs in specialist obstetric care rather than casual supplement use.
L-Arginine supports nitric-oxide signaling as a vasodilatory pathway. Higher oral/systemic exposure is more plausibly linked to hemodynamic effects, but clinical outcomes are population-dependent.
Outcomes
Safety
Evidence
Dong JY et al., Am Heart J. 2011, 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.09.012 (PMID: 22137067)
Population: Adults with oral dosing, n=387
Dose protocol: 4–24 g/day, short to mid-term interventions
Key findings: SBP decreased by ~5.39 mmHg. DBP by ~2.66 mmHg versus placebo
Notes: Moderate. Small heterogeneous RCT set and trial design variability.
SBP decreased by ~5.39 mmHg; DBP by ~2.66 mmHg versus placebo
Rhim HC et al., J Sex Med. 2019, 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.12.002 (PMID: 30770070)
Population: Men with mild–moderate ED, n=540
Dose protocol: 1.5–5 g/day across trials, weeks to months
Key findings: Higher response odds for ED outcomes versus control (OR 3.37, 95% CI 1.29–8.77)
Notes: Mildly moderate. Protocol heterogeneity and dosage variability increase interpretability limits.
Higher response odds for ED outcomes versus control (OR 3.37; 95% CI 1.29–8.77)
Menafra D et al., J Endocrinol Invest. 2022, 10.1007/s40618-021-01704-3 (PMID: 34973154)
Population: Vasculogenic ED (mild-mod/severe), n=98
Dose protocol: 6 g/day orally, 3 months
Key findings: Improved IIEF-6 scores. Greater benefit in mild-moderate subgroup
Notes: Single-center trial with limited size and subgroup imbalance potential.
Improved IIEF-6 scores; greater benefit in mild-moderate subgroup
Park H-Y et al., Nutrients. 2023, 10.3390/nu15051268 (PMCID: PMC10005484; PMID: 36904267)
Population: Recreational/trained adults in cardiovascular and performance studies
Dose protocol: Reported dose-dependent context. Includes 0.075 g/kg Arg and 2.4–6 g/day Cit ranges in cited studies
Key findings: Largely inconsistent for performance. Citrulline signals stronger than arginine in some athletic subgroups
Notes: Not a primary trial dataset. Conclusions limited by source heterogeneity.
Largely inconsistent for performance; citrulline signals stronger than arginine in some athletic subgroups
Makama M et al., BJOG. 2025, 10.1111/1471-0528.18070 (PMID: 39800868)
Population: Pregnant people with hypertensive disorder risk, n=2028 in RCTs
Dose protocol: Prenatal intervention timing and dosing varied by trial
Key findings: Reduced pre-eclampsia risk in prevention subset (RR 0.52), evidence rated low/very low for some secondary outcomes
Notes: High risk of bias in 8 RCTs and some concerns in 12 others.
Reduced pre-eclampsia risk in prevention subset (RR 0.52), evidence rated low/very low for some secondary outcomes
WADA Prohibited List (2026) official resource, WADA website
Population: Athlete eligibility framework (not a clinical trial)
Dose protocol: Annual annualized list, in force 1 Jan 2026
Key findings: No arginine-specific ingredient ban identified in list resources accessed. Classification status must still be checked each season
Notes: Regulatory status is dynamic. User-level risk remains contamination-based even when ingredient not explicitly banned.
No arginine-specific ingredient ban identified in list resources accessed; classification status must still be checked each season
FDA. Information for Consumers on Using Dietary Supplements. 2026 update
Population: US supplement market/regulatory context
Dose protocol: Not outcome-based
Key findings: Supplements may be marketed without prior FDA safety/effectiveness approval. Post-market risk persists
Notes: Not efficacy data. Governance context only.
Supplements may be marketed without prior FDA safety/effectiveness approval; post-market risk persists
Camarena Pulido EE, García Benavides L, Panduro Barón JG, Pascoe Gonzalez S, Madrigal Saray AJ, García Padilla FE, et al. Efficacy of L-arginine for preventing preeclampsia in high-risk pregnancies: A double-blind, randomized, clinical trial. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2016;35(2):217-225. doi:10.3109/10641955.2015.1137586. PMID:27003763.
Population: Pregnant patients at high risk for preeclampsia.
Dose protocol: Oral L-arginine started at 20 weeks gestation in high-risk pregnancies.
Key findings: Trial reported fewer preeclampsia cases, higher birth weight, and fewer preterm births versus placebo.
Notes: Strong single-trial signal, but still not enough for unsupervised pregnancy supplementation claims.
This is the clearest single randomized pregnancy trial behind arginine's preeclampsia-prevention signal. It found fewer preeclampsia cases and fewer preterm births in a high-risk cohort, but it is still one study in a specialized setting. It supports a cautious pregnancy-research claim, not casual self-use in pregnancy.